Tuesday, 12 February 2013

Steyn Time




 Mark Steyn

If you don’t visit his website every so often, you ought to. Since the splendidly robust Conrad Black got fitted up in America for nicking a bit of office stationery (the other 44 charges having been dismissed, 2 on appeal), and the rather more cautious Barclay Brothers took over the Telegraph Group, Mark Steyn has been largely absent from the British press. I think it’s a damn shame, mainly because the current lot of intelligent columnists we have in Britain pussyfoot around when it comes to Islam. True, they live in an overcrowded island with an ineffective police force, so a degree of self-preservation is rational. Steyn, on the other hand, lives in the mountains of New Hampshire where defence of one’s property and person is not a subject for debate.

That Steyn overstates his case goes without saying; he is a polemicist, and hates nuance. Indeed, he thinks that it is endless nuance and hand-wringing liberal guilt that has landed us in the tricky situation (which he would call the almighty mess) that we find ourselves in with Islam. But he writes with such passion and good humour. I met him once at a London political event and he is very much the same in the flesh – quick-witted, self-confident and amusing.

Here he is, presenting a free speech prize to Lars Hedegaard at the European Parliament. Hedegaard won’t mean much to you and me, being a Marxist and a journalist who writes in Danish. He is uncomplimentary about Islam's effect on his country. He found himself opening his door to a ‘postman’ recently, who contrived to miss him from point-blank range with a pistol. It would be fair to say that his life insurance premiums are now unaffordable.

Steyn's speech is less about Hedegaard, and more about the attitude of the Left in Europe to Islam. It is right on the button and often darkly comic:

Two years ago, as part of Lars' conference on Islam and humor, I shared a platform in Copenhagen with the Swedish artist Lars Vilks. They have a tradition in Sweden of roundabout dogs - canine scultptures that pop up mysteriously on Swedish roundabouts - and Lars Vilks decided to do a drawing of Mohammed as a roundabout dog. He wound up with a fatwa on his head. And one night he came home to find the jihad boys had firebombed his kitchen. As they escaped across the field heady with the thrill of their glorious victory, they noticed that in the course of setting Mr Vilks' home alight they'd also accidentally set their trousers on fire, and, after some effort to extinguish their smoking pantaloons, were forced to discard them. Unfortunately, in abandoning their pants and scampering off through the icy night in their jihadist underwear, they neglected to remove the charred driver's licenses and other identifying documentation, from which police were able easily to track them down. When Mr Vilks told this story in Copenhagen, the whole room was roaring with laughter. Muslim terrorists are like Yosemite Sam in the Loony Tunes cartoons, forever shoving the stick of dynamite in their own pants – until one day Yosemite Ahmed manages to get it right. After the bombing of the British Conservative Party conference in 1984, the IRA taunted Mrs Thatcher: "You have to be lucky every day, we only have to be lucky once." Those jihad incompetents with the smoking trousers would modify the line: We only have to be competent once, and no matter how many years roll by they'll keep trying. Over four years after Mr Vilks' drawing, seven men were arrested in Waterford, Ireland for plotting to kill him. I don't know how many of you know Waterford. It sits in a beautiful spot on the southern Irish coast, the oldest city in the country, population about 45,000. And yet in an Irish city of 45,000 you can find seven men willing to kill a Swedish artist. At the height of the so-called Irish "Troubles", you'd have been hard put to find seven residents of Waterford willing to participate in a plot to kill a British cabinet minister. But in the new multicultural Waterford you can find seven men willing to kill some guy halfway across Europe over a four-year-old drawing.

Or this:

After that conference with Lars in Copenhagen a couple of years ago, I took the train over the water to Malmö in Sweden. Malmö was one of the first Christian cities in what was then Denmark. It's now on course to become the first Muslim city in Sweden. I sat and had a coffee in a nice little place in a beautiful medieval square in the heart of town. Aside from a few modernist excrescences, it would not have looked so different in the early days of the Lutheran church. I got lucky, and fell into conversation with a couple of cute Swedish blondes. Fine-looking ladies. I shall miss Scandinavian blondes when they're extinct. At dusk, and against their advice, I took a 20-minute walk to Rosengard. As you stroll the sidewalk, the gaps between blondes grow longer, and the gaps between young bearded Muslim men grow shorter. And then eventually you're in the housing projects, and all the young boys kicking a soccer ball around are Muslim, and every single woman is covered – including many who came from "moderate" Muslim countries and did not adopt the headscarf or hijab until they emigrated to Sweden, where it's compulsory, at least in Rosengard.
.......
I would urge anyone to do that twilight walk from downtown Malmö to Rosengard, as the blondes thin and the bearded men multiply. That's Europe's future walking toward you, and most Europeans did not choose to live in that world. In Malmö, in Rotterdam, in Yorkshire and here in Brussels, their betters made the decision for them. A society that becomes more Muslim becomes less everything else – less Jewish, less gay, less feminist, less artistic, less scientific, less free. That's a simple statement of fact, but we shrink from it.

Dammit, read the whole thing.

 

Monday, 11 February 2013

Odd Bedfellows


 Former friends: Prince Rupert and Mick Jagger, pictured together at The Rock and Roll Hall of Fame at The Waldorf Astoria, New York in 1989, parted on good terms, something which seems to have changed

Rock n' roll banker: Prince Rupert Loewenstein, pictured in 1991 with Keith Richards, has written a book about his years as the Stones' financial manager which has Mick Jagger fuming













The fellow we used to see in this parish who called himself Tuscan Tony (now either banned from blogging by the fair Tuscana, or perhaps more of a Facebook man), nevertheless stays in touch. As he surveyed the Daily Mail this weekend, perched upon his Tuscan hillside in balmy early spring sunshine (or driving Apennine sleet, take your pick), he alighted upon this story and sent it to me.

I worked for the said Bavarian princeling and his clients the Rolling Stones as investment director for about five years in the early 90s. Without betraying confidences, I am surprised that Rupert Loewenstein has written any book at all, let alone a memoir of his life as financial advisor to the Stones. He was an aesthete, with a penchant for classical music and expensive books and manuscripts. His house on the Thames at Petersham was splendid. He always behaved like an old-fashioned English gentleman banker, for whom discretion and reticence were second nature (and, *ahem* still are, for some). I liked him very much. Without ever running the risk of overpaying me, he was otherwise generous, letting me stay in his house in LA on occasional visits and treating me (correctly, I thought) as though I were a junior partner of his bank. His one failing was to serve German wine at lunch, with its overtones of air freshener.Otherwise, he came across as an English aristo, albeit more of a metropolitan one rather than a landowner.

I also liked Jagger and would happily have spent more time in his company discussing cricket and politics. But this was the nineties, not the sixties. I have to imagine what he was like in 1968. Louche, lascivious and lefty, I would have thought. And he might – just might – have had an ego thing.

So it is a delicious irony that the modern-day Sir Michael Jagger, Kt, should be referring to Prince Rupert as his ‘ex-bank manager’ and accusing him of ‘bad manners’! Wonderful. "Those financial professionals are such riff-raff, are they not, Keef?" "Yeah, brother, I hear ya".

Loewenstein was a canny banker and a very good businessman. He was the architect of the band’s massive touring income. I think I’m right in saying that he was the first man to get an entire world tour underwritten by a sponsor, which effectively changed the game for all the big acts who came later. Touring had been a loss-leader for selling records; I doubt Rupert was quite brilliant enough to see the end of record/cd sales quite so far in advance, but by golly the Stones were the first to benefit from the big touring bucks.

They were good for one another. I am surprised at a public tiff.

Wednesday, 6 February 2013

The Smoking Gun

Cunning devils, those money market traders. Look how they brilliantly throw sand on their tracks, in this taped conversation released after RBS was fined the thick end of £400m smackeroos today:

August 20, 2007:
Senior Yen Trader: This Libor setting is getting nuts.
Senior Yen Trader 2: It's just amazing how libor fixing can make you that much money.

Oh dear. Even Dixon of Dock Green could have worked out who to 'accompany me to the station' after hearing that one.

And Miss Marple wasn't needed to decipher this one:

September 15, 2009:
Yen Trader 1: Can we lower our fixings today please?
Primary Submitter: Make your mind up.  Haha , yes no probs.
Yen Trader 1: I'm like a whore's drawers.


Monday, 4 February 2013

Throw the Book at Him


Chris Huhne quits after guilty plea

Chris Huhne has announced he will quit as MP for Eastleigh in Hampshire after pleading guilty to perverting the course of justice, setting up a tense coalition battle as Conservatives and Liberal Democrats vie for the marginal seat.
Speaking outside court, Mr Huhne said: “I have pleaded guilty today. I am unable to say more while there is an outstanding trial.

“Having taken responsibility for something that happened 10 years ago, the only proper course of actions is for me to resign my Eastleigh seat in parliament and I will do so later today.”

 Now just hold on a minute............

Why has this lasted so long?

How could he possibly justify drawing his Parliamentary salary and pension contributions since the day he was charged?

Has he not caused a monumental waste of police time and resources?

I expect Mr Justice Hangemhigh to jail him, fine him, award all costs against him. If he does not, we will require an explanation.

Big Darren, occupant of Cell13, Block 5, Wandsworth, is wondering who his new cellmate is going to be, to play the role of Nurse in his Doctors and Nurses games after lights out each night.........



Wednesday, 30 January 2013

Just Plain Wrong








Just how stupid, sad and sick do you have to be to go to a demonstration with a poster like the one being held by the imbecilic man above?

Readers of this blog know only too well that I have an extremely low overall opinion of Cameron, but I do concede that he has his good points. One of them is that he empathises with the disabled in a way that no previous Tory leader (or any Prime Minister, probably ever) has done. His behaviour, and that of his family, over the life and death of his disabled son was exemplary. He cares, and is thoughtful. Though wrong-headed, his ring-fencing of the NHS budget in real terms for the term of this Parliament is a profound statement.

And if anyone thinks that Cameron is motivated by his OWN tax rate, they would be mistaken. The Tories are traditionally a lower-tax party than the alternatives, but that is the product of a Jeffersonian belief that good government is synonymous with an economy that is dominated by the private sector rather than the state. Cameron has, I believe, caved in to the illogical and spiteful left by reducing the top rate of tax by only 5p in the pound, when of course he should have dismantled the Brown time-bomb on Day 1, telling the country in no uncertain terms that it was bad for job creation, bad for tax revenues, and bad for free enterprise (and while he was about it, raising the tax threshold to £10,000 and taking millions of people out of tax altogether). The porridge-brained idiot with his placard could reflect on this, were he capable of lucid thought.

Tuesday, 29 January 2013

Typical of the Breed


I am assured this is for real. Courtesy of those competent fund managers at Artemis:

“Last year was a big one for me. I had my gastric band fitted, and took the opportunity to reassess my life. I read works by the great thinkers – Plato, Aristotle, Hegel, Lenin, Malcolm X, Bono, Will Hutton, Hitler – and revised fundamentally my whole philosophy. This year I will be voting LibDem in the local elections.”
– A member of the ‘online community’, 23 January 2013.


Monday, 28 January 2013

Of Little Importance

Is it just me, or might this have justified 30 seconds on the national news over the weekend? I can quite understand that the telly news was more interested in Adam Afriyie or Andy Murray or Harry's todger or the baby with its dummy gaffer-taped into its gob, but even the Today programme this morning at sparrows had nothing to say about it. I'm gobsmacked.

Torygraph Blog, this afternoon:


Is Iran's mystery nuclear explosion too good to be true?

Fordow Nuclear site, Iran
Fordow Nuclear site, Iran

What are we to make about reports from Israel that Iran's top secret Fordow nuclear facility has been hit by a massive underground explosion that has caused severe damage to the uranium enrichment programme and trapped 240 workers inside?
Claims that the explosion happened last Monday - just as Israelis were digesting the results of the general election – appeared on the Right-wing news website WND last Friday. But three days later the normally garrulous Israelis have gone strangely quiet, while there has likewise been no official comment from Iran.
The Fordow facility is, of course, a vital part of Iran's nuclear weapons programme. Constructed some 300 feet under a mountain, the complex is immune from attack by even the most sophisticated bunker buster bombs. And it is here that Iran is undertaking some of its most sensitive nuclear research, where an estimated 2,700 centrifuges are enriching uranium to 20 percent – just short of the level required to build a nuclear warhead.
It could be that the Iranians have deliberately leaked news of the explosion to prevent officials from the International Atomic Energy Agency from making one of their routine inspections. On the other hand the Israelis, who have never officially admitted responsibility for assassinating a number of Iranian nuclear scientists, may think it prudent to keep quiet about any involvement they might have had in the explosion for fear of provoking retaliation from Tehran.
Either way, for those of us who would prefer the global crisis over Iran's nuclear programme to be resolved without recourse to military action, the prospect of the Fordow complex being rendered inoperable just sounds too good to be true.


Con Coughlin

Con Coughlin is the Telegraph's Defence Editor and a world-renowned expert on global security and terrorism issues. He is the author of several critically acclaimed books. His new book, Khomeini's Ghost, is published by Macmillan. He appears regularly on radio and television in Britain and America.